Re: Database file copy

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Srini Raghavan" <sixersrini(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Database file copy
Date: 2011-01-14 20:41:13
Message-ID: 4D30608902000025000395F3@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I'm not wildly enthusiastic about breaking this with only one
> intervening release. We normally support deprecated syntax for
> quite a bit longer than that.

"one intervening release"? Where did you see that?

I thought we were just talking about deprecating the old syntax, not
breaking it. If history is any guide, getting the deprecation
mentioned in the docs now would lead to actual removal somewhere
around 10.0.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2011-01-14 20:41:39 Named restore points
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-14 20:36:02 Re: Database file copy