Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?
Date: 2010-12-17 23:49:00
Message-ID: 4D0BF6EC.2090309@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/17/10 3:34 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Oh, *I* understand the difference. Any app developer is going to see it
>> as stupidly arbitrary, though.
>
> Speaking as someone who spent 9 years doing app development, I dispute
> the word "any".

Ok, "lots" then. If it's not a good idea to enable that functionality,
then it would be nice to come up with some way to make it more clear why
it's failing.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-18 00:03:13 Re: Why don't we accept exponential format for integers?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-17 23:42:01 mingw make vs shell vs pwd -W