Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0
Date: 2010-12-15 05:08:24
Message-ID: 4D084D48.803@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/14/2010 12:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Another line of attack is that we know from the response packet that the
> failure is being reported at guc.c:4794. It would be really useful to
> know what the call stack is there. Could you change that elog to an
> elog(PANIC) and get a stack trace from the ensuing core dump?
>

That didn't work. But git bisect says it's this commit that's to blame:
<https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/e710b65c1c56ca7b91f662c63d37ff2e72862a94>

It's too late to dig further now.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-15 07:20:17 Re: unlogged tables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-15 03:55:46 Re: pg_execute_from_file, patch v10