On 12/02/2010 05:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> That's a big patch..
> Not nearly big enough :-(
>
> In the past, proposals for this have always been rejected on the grounds
> that it's impossible to assure a consistent dump if different
> connections are used to read different tables. I fail to understand
> why that consideration can be allowed to go by the wayside now.
>
>
Well, snapshot cloning should allow that objection to be overcome, no?
cheers
andrew