Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Date: 2010-11-23 02:03:13
Message-ID: 4CEB20E1.7030606@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/22/10 5:38 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Whatever we pick, someone will be confused by it and about equal numbers
> regardless. Let's just stick with the current patch.

... "original patch". Sorry. Let's not fiddle with the names.

>
> Or we could call it "extraint conclusions". ;-)
>
>

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-23 03:08:54 Re: reporting reason for certain locks
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-11-23 01:40:31 Re: reporting reason for certain locks