From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
Date: | 2010-11-14 16:08:18 |
Message-ID: | 4CE00972.1010106@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 11/14/2010 10:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> And on the fourth hand, what we're buying here is pretty marginal for
> developers and of no interest whatever for users.
>
> I still think it's worth looking into whether the bug can be dodged
> by shortening the eval calls. But if not, I think I'd vote for
> reverting. Maybe we could revisit this in a couple of years.
+1
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-14 16:24:08 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-14 16:08:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-14 16:24:08 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-14 16:08:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |