Markus Wanner wrote:
> I stand corrected. Do you actually use the TapReporter?
No. I know so little about TAP that I wasn't aware that dtester
output was in the TAP format until I saw your post on this thread, so
I went searching for the format to see what I might do to become more
compliant -- and found that through sheer luck I happened to be
compliant with the proposed spec. :-)
> Maybe I confused with the CursesReporter, which gets rather
> confused by custom output.
I can check what that requires. Perhaps I can cause the detail
output to not confuse that. [off to check...]
-Kevin