Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question?

From: Nick Matheson <Nick(dot)D(dot)Matheson(at)noaa(dot)gov>
To: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question?
Date: 2010-11-04 14:38:23
Message-ID: 4CD2C55F.3040307@noaa.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Andy-
> I have no idea if this would be helpful or not, never tried it, but
> when you fire off "select * from bigtable" pg will create the entire
> resultset in memory (and maybe swap?) and then send it all to the
> client in one big lump. You might try a cursor and fetch 100-1000 at
> a time from the cursor. No idea if it would be faster or slower.
I am pretty sure we have tried paged datasets and didn't see any
improvement. But we will put this on our list of things to double check,
better safe than sorry you know.

Thanks,

Nick

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nick Matheson 2010-11-04 14:42:08 Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question?
Previous Message Nick Matheson 2010-11-04 14:34:55 Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question?