Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-11-03 20:01:49
Message-ID: 4CD1795D020000250003721F@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
 
> I guess you built both in the same place and just prefix installed
> it to different directories?
 
We always build in a directory tree with a name based on the
version, with a prefix based on the version.  This is routine for
us.  I have a hard time believing that they made an error on that,
but I'll try to re-create in a controlled way so that I can report
specific error messages and confirm my assumptions.
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Eric DaviesDate: 2010-11-03 20:32:18
Subject: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?
Previous:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2010-11-03 19:57:59
Subject: Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group