| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)spnz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql |
| Date: | 2010-10-30 20:24:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4CCC7F11.5080200@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 10/29/10 2:37 PM, Brian Hurt wrote:
>
> For the record, the table we're having trouble inserting into is ~100
> rows with ~50 indexes on it. E.F Codd is spinning in his grave. The
> reason they went with this design (instead of one that has two tables,
> each with 3-6 columns, and about that many indexes) is that "joins are
> slow". Which they may be on Mysql, I don't know. But this is
> (unfortunately) a different battle.
Not sure that that'll be any better on Postgres then. Few DBMSes
optimize for "stupid design". Maybe they should go with a "NoSQL"
database.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2010-10-30 21:03:22 | Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-10-30 16:20:30 | Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql |