Re: Per-column collation, work in progress

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-column collation, work in progress
Date: 2010-10-21 20:44:33
Message-ID: 4CC0A631.1020708@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I think that that would probably involve a whole lot more notational
> busywork than just replacing typmod with something more complicated.
> However, we're talking about breaking vast amounts of code in either
> case, so maybe making it even vaster isn't a real consideration.

Gods, yes. Please let's not extend typemod any further without an overhaul.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-21 20:48:18 find -path isn't portable
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-21 20:39:43 Re: Per-column collation, work in progress