Re: getting set up on git (finally)

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getting set up on git (finally)
Date: 2010-10-09 15:26:25
Message-ID: 4CB089A1.4080401@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/08/2010 08:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm finally trying to get current with the switch to git, following this
>> wiki page:
>>
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_with_Git
>>
>> Specifically, I am trying to do:
>> ------------
>> Dependent Clone per Branch, Pushing and Pulling From a Local Repository
>> -plus-
>> Clone Locally, Repoint Origin
>> ------------
>>
>> In order to set this up, I used the attached recipe. Does that look
>> reasonable and correct?
>>
>> I am hoping that from this point forward I can treat each of those
>> checked out branches exactly (more-or-less) as I did under cvs -- true? E.g.
>>
>> #make some changes
>> git commit -a
>> git push
>
> Looks fairly sane on a quick once-over.

Thanks. I was hoping you would say that :-)

Joe

--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2010-10-09 18:07:15 Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Previous Message Marios Vodas 2010-10-09 09:49:40 Re: compiling C library under mingw