| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: a few small bugs in plpgsql |
| Date: | 2010-10-08 01:35:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4CAE7552.2030906@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> b) SRF functions must not be finished by RETURN statement - I know, so
>> there is outer default block, but it looks like inconsistency for SRF
>> functions, because you can use a RETURN NEXT without RETURN. It maybe
>> isn't bug - but I am filling it as inconsistency.
Hmmm. Is there any likelyhood we'll go back to requiring the final
RETURN in the future?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-08 01:38:44 | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-08 01:19:10 | Re: a few small bugs in plpgsql |