Re: Issues with Quorum Commit

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Date: 2010-10-07 11:48:49
Message-ID: 4CADB3A1.2010502@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/07/2010 01:08 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Adding timeout is very little code. We can take that out of the patch if
> that's an objection.

Okay. If you take it out, we are at the wait-forever option, right?

If not, I definitely don't understand how you envision things to happen.
I've been asking [1] about that distinction before, but didn't get a
direct answer.

Regards

Markus Wanner

[1]: Re: Configuring synchronous replication, Markus Wanner:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4C9C5887.4040901@bluegap.ch

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-07 11:55:42 Re: todo point: plpgsql - scrollable cursors are supported
Previous Message Steve Singer 2010-10-07 11:46:32 Re: Sync Rep at Oct 5