Re: Avoiding deadlocks ...

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Avoiding deadlocks ...
Date: 2010-08-20 08:39:44
Message-ID: 4C6E3F50.80404@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/19/10 3:51 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> This one is for you:
>
> Two sessions, in transaction:
>
> Process A Process B
>
> update session where id = X;
> update order where orderid = 5;
> update order where orderid = 5;
> update order where orderid = 5;
> ... deadlock error.

Johto on IRC pointed out I left something out of the above: "session" is
referenced in an FK by "orders", and session = X is related to orderid = 5.

>
> It seems like we ought to be able to avoid a deadlock in this case;
> there's a clear precedence of who grabbed the order row first. Does
> your serializability patch address the above situation at all?
>

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2010-08-20 08:50:20 Re: Avoiding deadlocks ...
Previous Message Max Bowsher 2010-08-20 07:49:09 Re: git: uh-oh