From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: About our GSoC projects |
Date: | 2010-08-18 08:37:20 |
Message-ID: | 4C6B9BC0.7070108@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le 18/08/2010 10:25, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
>> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
>> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
>> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
>> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
>
The "gleus branch", as you named it, should be a fork of "his branch",
right?
> That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
>
Yeah. I'm afraid all this will be a lot of work. Luis already worked
with git, so he's at least a bit familiar with it. Adeel didn't AFAICT,
so he'll need to learn all that. I also will need to learn a lot of it.
>>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The
>>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same
>>> account or a different one. I actually don't care.
>>
>> Dave, any comment on that?
>
> The same account seems fine to me.
>
+1
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-08-18 08:39:06 | Re: About our GSoC projects |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-08-18 08:32:05 | Re: About our GSoC projects |