Re: About our GSoC projects

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About our GSoC projects
Date: 2010-08-18 08:37:20
Message-ID: 4C6B9BC0.7070108@lelarge.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Le 18/08/2010 10:25, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
>> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
>> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
>> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
>> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
>

The "gleus branch", as you named it, should be a fork of "his branch",
right?

> That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
>

Yeah. I'm afraid all this will be a lot of work. Luis already worked
with git, so he's at least a bit familiar with it. Adeel didn't AFAICT,
so he'll need to learn all that. I also will need to learn a lot of it.

>>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The
>>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same
>>> account or a different one. I actually don't care.
>>
>> Dave, any comment on that?
>
> The same account seems fine to me.
>

+1

--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-08-18 08:39:06 Re: About our GSoC projects
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-08-18 08:32:05 Re: About our GSoC projects