Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4
Date: 2010-08-16 17:12:25
Message-ID: 4C697179.5080906@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-testers


> Yes, I run the tests on clean tables. I run VACUUM FULL, and after that
> I mesured how long it takes for VACUUM ANALYZE and VACUUM ANALYZE FULL.
> So, it is ok for VACUUM FULL (on clean tables) on 9.0b4 to be six times
> slower than on 8.4. But is it ok for plain VACUUM to be two times slower?

On clean or on dirty tables?

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-testers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jai Soni 2010-08-25 06:49:40 feature request in postgresql 9.0 release
Previous Message Mario Splivalo 2010-08-16 09:34:01 Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4