Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance
Date: 2010-08-06 00:31:50
Message-ID: 4C5B57F6.8070104@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 06/08/10 11:58, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Thursday, August 05, 2010, Mark Kirkwood<mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
> wrote:
>
>> Normally I'd agree with the others and recommend RAID10 - but you say
>> you have an OLAP workload - if it is *heavily* read biased you may get
>> better performance with RAID5 (more effective disks to read from).
>> Having said that, your sequential read performance right now is pretty
>> low (151 MB/s - should be double this), which may point to an issue
>> with this controller. Unfortunately this *may* be important for an OLAP
>> workload (seq scans of big tables).
>>
> Probably a low (default) readahead limitation. ext3 doesn't help but it can
> usually get up over 400MB/sec. Doubt it's the controller.
>
>

Yeah - good suggestion, so cranking up readahead (man blockdev) and
retesting is recommended.

Cheers

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-08-06 00:35:44 Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance
Previous Message Alan Hodgson 2010-08-05 23:58:13 Re: Advice configuring ServeRAID 8k for performance