| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Date: | 2010-08-04 19:58:05 |
| Message-ID: | 4C59C64D.7070001@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> Great, I was afraid people would want another beta if we forced an
> initdb. So a hearty +1 for fixing it and not doing another beta
> (pending other bugs obviously).
And, btw, there has been a lot of testing of pg_upgrade due to the
initdbs and otherwise. I think 9.0 is going to have a pretty darned
solid pg_upgrade because of it.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-04 20:02:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-08-04 19:55:52 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-04 20:02:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-08-04 19:55:52 | Re: Drop one-argument string_agg? (was Re: string_agg delimiter having no effect with order by) |