Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq, PQexecPrepared, data size sent to FE vs. FETCH_COUNT
Date: 2010-05-25 14:47:42
Message-ID: 4BFBE30E.6070305@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alex Goncharov wrote:
> ,--- I/Alex (Mon, 24 May 2010 12:25:18 -0400) ----*
> | No equivalent of FETCH_COUNT is available at the libpq level, so I
> | assume that the interface I am using is smart enough not to send
> | gigabytes of data to FE.
> |
> | Where does the result set (GBs of data) reside after I call
> | PQexecPrepared? On BE, I hope?
>
> Sorry for asking again...
>
> No sarcasm meant: is there no straightforward answer here? Or nobody
> is certain? Or a wrong list?
>
>
>

You have been given the answer. Please re-read the replies, e.g. the one
from Abhijit Menon-Sen.

The data is saved on the client side before the call returns. If that
uses too much memory, use a cursor.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Adams 2010-05-25 14:52:30 Re: JSON manipulation functions
Previous Message Mike Fowler 2010-05-25 14:31:08 [PATCH] Add XMLEXISTS function from the SQL/XML standard (was: Add xpath_exists Function)