Re: peer-to-peer replication with Postgres

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
Cc: Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: peer-to-peer replication with Postgres
Date: 2010-05-11 07:09:17
Message-ID: 4BE9029D.3030600@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/05/10 23:20, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com> wrote:
>> What's the best way to do this? Looks like something like pgPool
>> might be what I want, but I haven't looked into it deeply yet.
>
> I don't think your requirement and postgres are consistent with each
> other.

Seconded. I think the OP needs to look into "eventually consistent"
horizontally-scalable databases that're designed for this use - but
don't usually offer an SQL interface or ACID semantics.

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing: http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2010-05-11 07:12:11 Re: Run Vacuum Through JDBC
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-05-11 07:04:31 Re: initdb fails on Centos 5.4 x64