| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Date: | 2010-05-05 04:01:04 |
| Message-ID: | 4BE0ED80.3030102@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Should I be concerned that we are redesigning HS features at this stage
>> in the release?
>>
>
> Yep. You can decide whether you want to be concerned by the redesign
> itself, or by the concerns about the underlying code that are
> motivating the redesigns, but yes, you should definitely be concerned.
>
>
>
Our process is shot to pieces. But then, we knew that, didn't we ;-)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-05-05 04:18:38 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-05 03:53:27 | Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels |