Re: GUCs that need restart

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUCs that need restart
Date: 2010-05-04 20:59:14
Message-ID: 4BE044520200002500031291@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> There are quite a few GUC parameters that need restart. Is there a
> way we can avoid some of them needing restart? I am specifically
> looking at archive_mode and the new wal_level.

I'll second this on a "don't know if it's practicable, but it would
be nice if..." basis.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-05-04 21:12:38 Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-04 20:57:38 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful