Scaling further up

From: "Anjan Dave" <adave(at)vantage(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Scaling further up
Date: 2004-03-01 15:35:30
Message-ID: 4BAFBB6B9CC46F41B2AD7D9F4BBAF78509802F@vt-pe2550-001.vantage.vantage.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

All:

We have a Quad-Intel XEON 2.0GHz (1MB cache), 12GB memory, running RH9,
PG 7.4.0. There's an internal U320, 10K RPM RAID-10 setup on 4 drives.

We are expecting a pretty high load, a few thousands of 'concurrent'
users executing either select, insert, update, statments.

What is the next step up in terms of handling very heavy loads?
Clustering?

Are there any standard, recommended clustering options?

How about this? http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org
<http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org>

Also, in terms of hardware, overall, what benefits more, a SunFire 880
(6 or 8 CPUs, lots of RAM, internal FC Drives) type of machine, or an
IA-64 architecture?

Appreciate any inputs,

Thanks,
Anjan
************************************************************************
**

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended for the use
of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential and covered by the
attorney/client and other privileges. If you received this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and
delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-03-01 16:26:50 Re: Slow query
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-03-01 14:34:57 Re: compiling 7.4.1 on Solaris 9