| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ? |
| Date: | 2010-03-16 01:42:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4B9EE212.8060401@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> It would be fun to put Oracle there, but that seems like inviting trouble.
Would it be worthwhile to ask them?
I seem to recall at one point IBM bragging about supporting Oracle on Solaris
with Windows clients - despite IBM owning competing software across the whole
stack.
I imagine many (perhaps nearly all) large companies have multiple database products
somewhere.
I could imagine Oracle wanting to continue to support them, even if
their ulterior motive is to try to switch the user to Sleepycat / BDB or
InnoDB / InnoBase or whatever other data storage products the might own.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-16 03:13:02 | Re: Re: [PERFORM] [offtopic] Problems subscribing to Postgres mailing lists |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-03-16 01:23:53 | Re: Re: [PERFORM] [offtopic] Problems subscribing to Postgres mailing lists |