Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ?
Date: 2010-03-05 20:06:31
Message-ID: 4B916447.7040705@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 3/5/10 11:32 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 11:24 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Yeah. Would it actually be in violation of their published trademark
>>> policy though?
>> They can only issue a takedown notice. They can't sue us.
>>
>> All the same, it feels too much like bear-bating for me to be
>> comfortable with it. I'm afraid that calling attention to Snoracle's
>> ongoing contributions to PostgreSQL will simply hasten the day when
>> those contributions will stop.
>>
>> I'd suggest keeping Sun as Silver for now, and seeing what the summer
>> brings, when Oracle gets done re-orging.
>
> Well one isn't part of the other. You are thinking Sponsors versus
> professional support page.

I thought we'd settled the professional support issue. Snoracle is no
longer selling PostgreSQL support, therefore it comes off the PS page.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-07 01:51:04 press email list
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-03-05 19:32:31 Re: Removing Sun from the "Professional Support" pages ?