Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
Date: 2010-03-05 19:18:57
Message-ID: 4B915921.4010707@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I didn't get that initially from how you characterized this as "past
> time" to add.  It's at
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Point-In-Time_Recovery_.28PITR.29 now.

Sorry for not being clear.  I took it for granted that since it's past
2/15, no non-critical patches would be even considered.  And
pg_controldata certainly isn't critical.

--Josh Berkus


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-05 19:42:57
Subject: Re: arithmetic about inet
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-03-05 19:11:18
Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group