Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
Date: 2010-03-05 19:11:18
Message-ID: 4B915756.4070209@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Oh, I wasn't proposing doing *anything* for 9.0. I wanted to get
> something on the TODO list for 9.1. As far as I'm concerned, 9.0 is
> closed to new ideas. We have enough bugs to fix as it is.
>

I didn't get that initially from how you characterized this as "past
time" to add. It's at
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Point-In-Time_Recovery_.28PITR.29 now.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-03-05 19:18:57 Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-03-05 18:59:23 Re: SQL compatibility reminder: MySQL vs PostgreSQL