Josh Berkus wrote:
> Oh, I wasn't proposing doing *anything* for 9.0. I wanted to get
> something on the TODO list for 9.1. As far as I'm concerned, 9.0 is
> closed to new ideas. We have enough bugs to fix as it is.
>
I didn't get that initially from how you characterized this as "past
time" to add. It's at
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Point-In-Time_Recovery_.28PITR.29 now.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Josh Berkus | Date: 2010-03-05 19:18:57 |
| Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata? |
| Previous: | From: Robert Haas | Date: 2010-03-05 18:59:23 |
| Subject: Re: SQL compatibility reminder: MySQL vs PostgreSQL |