Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
Date: 2010-03-05 19:11:18
Message-ID: 4B915756.4070209@2ndquadrant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Oh, I wasn't proposing doing *anything* for 9.0.  I wanted to get
> something on the TODO list for 9.1.  As far as I'm concerned, 9.0 is
> closed to new ideas.  We have enough bugs to fix as it is.
>   

I didn't get that initially from how you characterized this as "past 
time" to add.  It's at 
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Point-In-Time_Recovery_.28PITR.29 now.

-- 
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-03-05 19:18:57
Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-05 18:59:23
Subject: Re: SQL compatibility reminder: MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group