Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
Date: 2010-03-05 18:38:35
Message-ID: 4B914FAB.4030209@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/5/10 10:28 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> 
> I would rather have the ability to tweak on this for a few months to get
> everything right, while being able to expose regular updates outside of
> core, than to commit "this is the best we've got so far" just under the
> wire for 9.0 without necessarily enough time to do it well.

Oh, I wasn't proposing doing *anything* for 9.0.  I wanted to get
something on the TODO list for 9.1.  As far as I'm concerned, 9.0 is
closed to new ideas.  We have enough bugs to fix as it is.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-03-05 18:48:00
Subject: Re: SQL compatibility reminder: MySQL vs PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-03-05 18:28:39
Subject: Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group