| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on read-only slave? |
| Date: | 2010-02-18 03:07:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4B7CAEE6.8010702@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The explanation is wrong, but it's still disallowed.
>>
> What's the actual reason for the restriction then? I did a whole
> proofreading round on the HS documentation the other day and am
> working on a patch to clean up everything I found, can add better
> notes about this to it.
Will answer my own question now, from the commit log:
"There is not yet any facility for HS slaves to receive notifications
generated on the master,
although such a thing is possible in future."
I'll include that detail in the doc patch I'm working on.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-02-18 03:09:44 | Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on read-only slave? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-18 03:06:46 | Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on read-only slave? |