Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Amitabh Kant" <amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jesper Krogh" <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!
Date: 2010-02-09 17:44:42
Message-ID: 4B714AAA020000250002F0F5@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Amitabh Kant <amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Just curious if you have a 16 physical CPU's or 16 cores on 4
> CPU/8 cores over 2 CPU with HT.

Four quad core CPUs:

vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7350 @ 2.93GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2931.978
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2010-02-09 19:14:11 Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline
Previous Message Amitabh Kant 2010-02-09 17:37:21 Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!