> I still think that changing it now is going to open a can of worms that
> we shouldn't be opening at this stage. We have got more than enough to
> worry about for 9.0 already. I think it is absolute folly to believe
> that this is only going to be a matter of "flip the default and nothing
> else is going to pop up".
I'll support Tom on this. I'm already worried about the timeline.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2010-02-03 19:15:56|
|Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH] |
|Previous:||From: Joshua Tolley||Date: 2010-02-03 19:13:31|
|Subject: Making pg_config and pg_controldata output available via SQL|