| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2010-01-23 21:19:11 |
| Message-ID: | 4B5B67CF.2000105@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat wrote:
> I'm not saying there aren't
> downsides, but having a name the community can unify on is a definite plus, and
> imho that name has to be Postgres.
>
Translation: "we'll only be unified if everyone agrees with me."
Sorry, that is quite clearly not going to happen.
Can we please get on with actually making a better product? Raising this
issue again is simply an unnecessary distraction.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-23 21:22:24 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2010-01-23 21:08:35 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-23 21:22:24 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2010-01-23 21:08:35 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |