Re: win32 socket definition

From: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: win32 socket definition
Date: 2010-01-10 12:33:45
Message-ID: 4B49C929.8030005@mansionfamily.plus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> There's another copy of ListenSocket[] in the BackendParameters struct.
> I also wonder about postmaster.c's habit of using -1 for empty slots
> in ListenSocket ... how safe is that for Win64?
>
On Windows, it should be INVALID_SOCKET.

James

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-01-10 12:44:17 Re: win32 socket definition
Previous Message Tim Bunce 2010-01-10 12:29:32 Re: Initial refactoring of plperl.c - updated