Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>,<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Date: 2010-01-06 22:04:53
Message-ID: 4B44B4A5020000250002DDFE@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I think you should have users/kgrittner/postgres.git rather than
> serializable.git. serializable sounds more like the branch name.

Hmmm.... On a multi-year project it seemed more than remotely
possible that responsibility for the project could shift, either to
an external contractor or some other programmer here, so a name
related to the reason for the repository rather than the current
lead programmer seemed to make sense. One wouldn't want the
repository location shifting based on assignments, I would have
thought. But if that's going to throw people, I can easily withdraw
my original request and resubmit along the lines you mention. I'll
wait a bit for other comments before taking any action.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-01-06 22:08:04 Re: unresolved bugs
Previous Message Arie Bikker 2010-01-06 21:59:30 Re: xpath improvement suggestion