Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Jason DiCioccio <jd(at)ods(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Livni <josh(at)umbrellaconsulting(dot)com>, SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Date: 2009-12-10 19:59:39
Message-ID: 4B21532B.8050306@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: sfpug


> Just to clarify, Joyent does this too, no? Or is it just that the
> Solaris scheduler handles the prioritization of tasks/resources
> better? I haven't yet had the chance to use Joyent, but I thought
> this was one of their selling points.

It depends on the size of your instance. If you're using a whole CPU
(not core, CPU) Joyent can dedicate that CPU to you and nobody else can
touch it. One of the advantages of Solaris over Xen.

--Josh

In response to

Browse sfpug by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Ghidinelli 2009-12-10 20:05:49 Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2009-12-10 19:56:58 Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?