Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

From: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kurt Harriman <harriman(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Date: 2009-12-02 19:45:44
Message-ID: 4B16C3E8.2080303@mansionfamily.plus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Kreen wrote:
> Note - my proposal would be to get rid of HAVE_INLINE, which
> means we are already using inline functions unconditionally
> on platforms that matter (gcc). Keeping duplicate code
> for obsolete compilers is pointless.
>
Microsoft C doesn't matter?

I seem to remember that when the Win32 version became available it
actually increased the
number of people trying postgres rather dramatically. Did that count
for nothing?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-02 19:51:45 Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-12-02 19:27:40 Re: Page-level version upgrade (was: Block-level CRC checks)