RE: Questions about Synonyms - Again

From: Colin Taylor <Colin_Taylor(at)PortaSystemsDev(dot)com>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Pgsql Mailing List (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Questions about Synonyms - Again
Date: 2001-01-19 15:53:29
Message-ID: 4B045DC53446D111A6CD00A0C949AB735E78D2@TOBY
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I am comparing it to Oracle's public synonyms, where you can use different
names for things.
For example, table "THIS_IS_A_VERY_BYG_NAME" could be accessed using a
smaller name, example "TIAVBN".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:56 PM
> To: Colin Taylor
> Cc: Pgsql Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Questions about Synonyms - Again
>
>
> Colin Taylor writes:
>
> > Are Synonyms supported on Postgresql?
>
> There is nothing in PostgreSQL that's called a "synonym" per
> se, so you
> have to describe what you mean by it.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-19 15:55:31 Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again
Previous Message Joel Bernstein 2001-01-19 15:49:44 Re: Why does the JDBC driver not support prepareCall?