From: | Colin Taylor <Colin_Taylor(at)PortaSystemsDev(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Pgsql Mailing List (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Questions about Synonyms - Again |
Date: | 2001-01-19 15:53:29 |
Message-ID: | 4B045DC53446D111A6CD00A0C949AB735E78D2@TOBY |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I am comparing it to Oracle's public synonyms, where you can use different
names for things.
For example, table "THIS_IS_A_VERY_BYG_NAME" could be accessed using a
smaller name, example "TIAVBN".
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:56 PM
> To: Colin Taylor
> Cc: Pgsql Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Questions about Synonyms - Again
>
>
> Colin Taylor writes:
>
> > Are Synonyms supported on Postgresql?
>
> There is nothing in PostgreSQL that's called a "synonym" per
> se, so you
> have to describe what you mean by it.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-19 15:55:31 | Re: Questions about Synonyms - Again |
Previous Message | Joel Bernstein | 2001-01-19 15:49:44 | Re: Why does the JDBC driver not support prepareCall? |