From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp |
Subject: | Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363) |
Date: | 2009-10-15 01:21:27 |
Message-ID: | 4AD67917.5000504@ak.jp.nec.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> 2009/10/13 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>> The attached patch is a revised one with the following updates:
>
> Despite two fairly explicit requests, this patch (and, with the
> exception of ECPG, only this patch) has not yet been reviewed by a
> committer.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00591.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00652.php
>
> Are any of the committers willing to take a look at this? Tom?
> Alvaro, maybe? Bruce?
In actually, I cannot believe this patch to be perfectly commitable
by the 15-Oct due to the remaining time, but it is necessary to be
comittable at the head of the next commit fest.
In other word, I strongly want to continue the discussion and revising
the patch, even if it will be actually commited at the 15-Nov.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-10-15 01:24:18 | Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-10-15 01:20:23 | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |