Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects
Date: 2009-10-07 21:27:47
Message-ID: 4ACD07D3.6020700@cs.helsinki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
> <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Right. This is exactly what I'm trying to do, except I think we could
>> easily optimize this case and store only the first processed row inside
>> the CTE.
>>
>
> why? we don't should be thinking in optimizations in this phase
>

Maybe you're right. This probably isn't a very common case any way.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-10-07 21:32:48 Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2009-10-07 21:22:21 Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects