Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Best suiting OS

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Karl Denninger" <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>, "Denis Lussier" <denis(dot)lussier(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "S Arvind" <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Scott Carey" <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS
Date: 2009-10-05 20:26:01
Message-ID: 4ACA1009020000250002B623@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Claus Guttesen <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
 
>
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=13001+0+current/freebsd-performance
 
Not being particularly passionate about any OS, I've been intrigued by
the FreeBSD benchmarks.  However, management is reluctant to use boxes
which don't have heavily-advertised decals on the front.  At the
moment they're going with IBM X-series boxes, and FreeBSD isn't
supported, so we'd be on our own.  Has anyone had any experience with
this combination?  (In particular, our biggest machines are x3850 M2
boxes.)
 
Oh, and of course I dispute the supremacy of vim as an editor -- why
use that when you've got "ed"?  ;-)
 
-Kevin

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Axel RauDate: 2009-10-05 20:27:46
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS
Previous:From: Karl DenningerDate: 2009-10-05 19:39:54
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group