| From: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mirko Pace <mirkop82(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UPDATE statement with syntax error doesn't raise a warning? |
| Date: | 2009-09-25 15:26:02 |
| Message-ID: | 4ABCE10A.2030103@squeakycode.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Mirko Pace wrote:
> I've ran an update statement like this (obviously wrong, I know!):
>
> update my_table
> set boolean_field = true AND
> my_notes = 'something'
> where id in
> (select id from my_table order by random() limit 4000);
>
> in my psql client and I had a "UPDATE 4000" result but, correctly,
> anything was changed in my_table.
>
> So... why pg didn't raise a warning about syntax issue?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Mirko
>
> P.S.
> PostgreSQL 8.3.8 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (Debian
> 4.3.2-1.1) 4.3.2
> psql 8.3.8 (Ubuntu package)
are you sure its wrong?
maybe pg looked at it like:
boolean_field = (true AND my_notes = 'something')
-Andy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David W Noon | 2009-09-25 15:36:43 | Re: UPDATE statement with syntax error doesn't raise a warning? |
| Previous Message | Tim Landscheidt | 2009-09-25 15:25:58 | Re: UPDATE statement with syntax error doesn't raise a warning? |