From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] Mail<->Usenet gateway back on ... |
Date: | 2008-01-17 06:15:57 |
Message-ID: | 4AB719AA96B7C0D9838635F1@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, January 17, 2008 01:08:05 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> pgsql.advocacy,@alt.*,@comp.*
>
>> Basically, what the above says (again, if I'm reading the man page
>> properly) is that all posts to pgsql.advocacy (this is for the
>> pgsql-advocacy, all others are configured the same), *except* those
>> that have a cross-post to any newsgroup in the alt.* or comp.*
>> hierarchies, will be forwarded ...
>
> Uh ... why reject cross-posts to comp.*? At least comp.databases.*
> should definitely be allowed. Also, the majority of the spam we saw
> yesterday seemed to be cross-posted to rec.* --- personally I'd try
> rejecting all the top-level hierarchies *except* comp.
>
> regards, tom lane
'k, here are the ones that can't be cross-posted from:
@alt.*,@sci.*,@rec.*,@misc.*,@soc.*
and fixed a 'hole' I missed earlier that Devrim just pointed out ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHjvKd4QvfyHIvDvMRAk23AJ41xJAXtIFgd7J4OUFU8Qmbx2tOhQCgz6GI
rtIxjhXrnxaatWtUhxIarfM=
=49A+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-01-17 06:16:14 | EGAD! pgsql-announce spam blast |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-01-17 06:11:57 | Re: Mail<->Usenet gateway back on ... |