Re: [CORE] Mail<->Usenet gateway back on ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] Mail<->Usenet gateway back on ...
Date: 2008-01-17 06:15:57
Message-ID: 4AB719AA96B7C0D9838635F1@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Thursday, January 17, 2008 01:08:05 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> pgsql.advocacy,@alt.*,@comp.*
>
>> Basically, what the above says (again, if I'm reading the man page
>> properly) is that all posts to pgsql.advocacy (this is for the
>> pgsql-advocacy, all others are configured the same), *except* those
>> that have a cross-post to any newsgroup in the alt.* or comp.*
>> hierarchies, will be forwarded ...
>
> Uh ... why reject cross-posts to comp.*? At least comp.databases.*
> should definitely be allowed. Also, the majority of the spam we saw
> yesterday seemed to be cross-posted to rec.* --- personally I'd try
> rejecting all the top-level hierarchies *except* comp.
>
> regards, tom lane

'k, here are the ones that can't be cross-posted from:

@alt.*,@sci.*,@rec.*,@misc.*,@soc.*

and fixed a 'hole' I missed earlier that Devrim just pointed out ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHjvKd4QvfyHIvDvMRAk23AJ41xJAXtIFgd7J4OUFU8Qmbx2tOhQCgz6GI
rtIxjhXrnxaatWtUhxIarfM=
=49A+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-17 06:16:14 EGAD! pgsql-announce spam blast
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-01-17 06:11:57 Re: Mail<->Usenet gateway back on ...