Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> There's some very good reasons for the health of the project to
>> have specific release dates and stick to them.
>
> Help me understand why?
I don't know how many places are like this, but to get any significant
staff or hardware resources officially allocated to anything here, you
need a minimum of three months lead time. (Less, of course, if things
are crashing and burning around our users' ears; more if the managers
don't see an immediate and direct benefit to the users.)
Any hope of organized participation by the Wisconsin Courts in a beta
program would require a date they can put on their calendars and
schedule around with confidence. As it is, what I do is based on
having permission to run tests on my own time when there are hardware
resources I can find to use which won't disrupt anything.
>From my perspective, a hard date for the beta release is more
important than a hard date for the production release. Management
here is very easy to sell on the concept that PostgreSQL stays in beta
testing until there is confidence that the release is stable and
trustworthy.
-Kevin