Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Higher TOAST compression.

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Laurent Laborde" <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Higher TOAST compression.
Date: 2009-07-22 15:08:11
Message-ID: 4A66E50B0200002500028B87@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote: 
> If we want to allow a compression target > external storage target,
> I guess we would have to allow the smaller target to go first
 
Scratch that part -- even with a compression target > the external
storage target, it would make sense use the same sequence of steps.
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2009-07-22 15:25:42
Subject: Re: Higher TOAST compression.
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-07-22 15:05:40
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group