Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?

Committed.

Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the
>> 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion
>> with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this
>> until the tree opens for 8.5.
>
> That's OK. I'll wait for 8.5.
>
>> It's not a very likely scenario that
>> anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on
>> it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense....
>
> My first concern was whether the latest pg_standby can work with old postgres
> (old libpq.so).
>
> Regards,
>

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com