| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5? |
| Date: | 2009-06-25 13:09:47 |
| Message-ID: | 4A43771B.9060201@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to remove the include directory in PG_CPPFLAGS
>> as well? Seems it is equally unused...
>
> No. I agree to remove PG_CPPFLAGS.
The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the
8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion
with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this
until the tree opens for 8.5. It's not a very likely scenario that
anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on
it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense....
--
Magnus Hagander
Self: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-06-25 13:24:58 | Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5? |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-06-25 13:03:33 | Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5? |