Re: Replication

From: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication
Date: 2009-06-24 19:59:30
Message-ID: 4A4285A2.2090501@serioustechnology.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mike Christensen wrote:
> We need to stop this thread, you guys are making me want to ditch
> Postgres and get Oracle (after taking out a second mortgage on my house
> that is)..

You must have a REALLY nice house with a LOT of equity...

>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net
> <mailto:spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> Craig Ringer wrote on 24.06.2009 04:07:
>
> Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>
> Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:
>
> Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and
> the others still
> replicate amongst themselves?)
>
> I think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.
>
>
> Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?
>
>
> As far as I know it is also a cluster of servers which can even hand
> over the processing of a single statement "in-flight" if the node
> goes down that is current processing the statement.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-06-24 20:08:38 Re: Replication
Previous Message Marko Pahić 2009-06-24 19:40:03 Re: A question about inheritance and sequence