Re: Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <zdenek(dot)kotala(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Subject: Re: Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2
Date: 2009-06-10 18:20:50
Message-ID: 4A2FF982.7010400@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andy,
>
>> 6) To the -hackers: I write the records and then refind them in the
>> exact same order, would it be a better test to search for records in a
>> more random order? would it make a difference? Would searching for some
>> but not all make a difference?
>
> Are you on OpenSolaris? Can you give your script to Zdenek & Jignesh to
> test in their enviroments?
>

I am not, and yes I can.

Hopefully I can attach a .tar.bz2

The bigtest.sh is the one to run (it runs all the parts). You'll need
to edit fill.pl and test.pl and set the dbname and maybe give a
username/password.

In the fill.pl there is a $max variable that's used to set the number of
records to insert. (its set to 10 million right now)

Oh, this .tar wont create a subdirectory

-Andy

Attachment Content-Type Size
test.tar.bz2 application/octet-stream 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-10 18:23:09 Re: Resolving 8.4 open items
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-06-10 18:19:43 Re: Problem with listen_addresses = '*' on 8.4beta2 on AIX